If we want to tackle LGBTQ+ health inequalities, we need better data. And better data starts with asking the right questions about sexual orientation and gender identity. But here is the challenge: these concepts are messy, personal, and constantly evolving. So how do we create standard categories that capture real experiences without forcing people into boxes?
Sexual Orientation Is Complicated
Research shows that sexual orientation has three overlapping parts: identity, attraction, and behaviour.
The problem is these do not always match up. For example, someone might identify as straight, be attracted to more than one gender, but only have relationships with one. Orientation can also shift over time, which makes it hard to fit neatly into a single category.
Even when surveys offer long lists of labels, people still say none of them fit. Options like “other” or “prefer not to say” help some people, but they make the data less clear. There may not be a single perfect solution, but the goal should be to create categories that are both inclusive and useful.
Gender Identity Is A Bit Clearer
When it comes to gender identity, many researchers suggest a two step approach: first ask about sex at birth, then ask about current gender identity. This tends to capture more accurate information.
But even here there are cultural and generational differences. What feels respectful to younger people may not feel the same to older generations. That means any standard has to be reviewed regularly and shaped with input from the communities it is meant to represent.
Trust Is Just As Important As The Questions
One of the biggest barriers to good data is trust. Many LGBTQ+ people hesitate to share personal details with healthcare providers because of past negative experiences or fear of stigma. Interestingly, doctors often assume patients will refuse to answer, but in reality most people will if they are asked in the right way.
The way questions are asked matters just as much as the questions themselves. Clear language, staff training, and genuine community involvement all help. Done well, asking about sexual orientation and gender identity can even build trust by showing patients that services see and respect them.
What Works Best
The research suggests that no single approach works everywhere. Surveys, interviews, and community based studies each add something valuable. What is clear is that we need clear definitions that people understand, categories that are inclusive but still practical, and systems that can evolve with social change.
What This Means For Wales
If Wales wants to create a national standard for sexual orientation and gender identity data, it needs to ask three key questions. How do we make categories inclusive and practical. How do we build trust in healthcare systems. How do we keep improving the system over time.
The aim is not just to fill in boxes on forms. It is to make sure LGBTQ+ people are counted, respected, and better served by healthcare.
Want to be part of a movement to make this happen?
Join the campaign: Count Us In
Queeraeth 
Leave a comment